Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9036D9F9D7A
	for <pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  5 Sep 2007 12:03:26 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 45859-04 for <pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  5 Sep 2007 12:03:24 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774E69F9D57
	for <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>; Wed,  5 Sep 2007 12:03:23 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l85F3MfU013116;
	Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:03:22 -0400 (EDT)
To: Daniel Rubio <drubior@tinet.org>
cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: No pg_dumplo on 8.2.4 
In-reply-to: <46DE5B39.3030902@tinet.org> 
References: <46DE5B39.3030902@tinet.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Rubio <drubior@tinet.org>
	message dated "Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:31:05 +0200"
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:03:22 -0400
Message-ID: <13115.1189004602@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200709/29
X-Sequence-Number: 26790

Daniel Rubio <drubior@tinet.org> writes:
> Now I see that theres is not pg_dumplo on contrib directory for 8.2.4 

That's because it's obsolete --- regular pg_dump can handle large
objects now.

			regards, tom lane