Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F6618FE98B
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Thu,  1 Dec 2011 15:24:08 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <mirrorx@gmail.com>) id 1RWCEq-0003wY-W1
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:24:09 +0000
Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com)
	by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <mirrorx@gmail.com>) id 1RWCEe-0000SM-7K
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 11:23:56 -0800
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:23:56 -0800 (PST)
From: MirrorX <mirrorx@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Message-ID: <1322767436219-5039677.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ED7C115.4010607@agliodbs.com>
References: <1322586733308-5033043.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<4ED69DCD.5000806@agliodbs.com>
	<1322688860656-5036800.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<4ED7C115.4010607@agliodbs.com>
Subject: Re: vacuum internals and performance affect
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pg-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Archive-Number: 201112/5
X-Sequence-Number: 45805

from what i ve read and have i ve seen in practice, i expected it to do
nothing at all. i just wanted to be absolutely sure and that's why i asked
here. 
thank you very much for the clarification

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/vacuum-internals-and-performance-affect-tp5033043p5039677.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.