Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TIxis-0006pl-RJ for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 08:20:59 +0000 Received: from nm25-vm5.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.109.206]) by makus.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TIxio-0004um-3p for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 08:20:58 +0000 Received: from [77.238.189.232] by nm25.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2012 08:20:51 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.118] by tm13.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2012 08:20:51 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1027.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2012 08:20:51 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 617416.63908.bm@omp1027.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 3595 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Oct 2012 08:20:51 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1349166051; bh=cbqT+L0GAlHUNy1lQUBgAaduM6Lcs/BlH8FGV7hBzrI=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=dcVomP6DUtbYRt8LFsI+fynQXwWkyi4VRtNrIqp0HOnkInMCUojboaJm/d8luFLjORJfSaU63Xifm9HBIpFtAbZhTzhZUkEQhVDS7Zx0gFQwReChRDIg7yH4TAEkx4kBI5P7p9NkGl6kqGu6qwOl1xbjFPb9CTl0wcRB3AGJTDs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UeNq6C9otCCKZn+ZCacb3eEh9FrVOvtpkrUx280MmE0kbcIIfmu+GPoPgBB/ufwLiOHHbp61MTZM841rFpTva3qbW9p3Up4nXVDKSqdNak/0qoIe2jSWXj+KNO1Fi9Uu4gqklWhY9h6a3XpMLctaFzGKVoWJi2eEYafkX8Aa01I=; X-YMail-OSG: 3Uimje8VM1nSTPlo3_vxVhhbVGLKsT5BjDvk0oiR7jz3Xxz TnieBWC4HWlRjzur6D0t9KhUgKqd__RaWeatyyp59WSzLgF_899xhpxNXgT5 Y.fkSdsjFmf4KLtEPRA4kwDsOvOmozHL1TEuV8d6Ie6qdyU.CQ9Ej_vCmtbv eBNnZlAEgel1wbR_2G.hS6twOuvPT83GvBN3ZLnTgBiTrb4ONa.xnXO85fcQ 2zbNWgMODfBSWzCu67MYUdjgWEe5cKLo.9ksdcA0t37k2hsfOEW31bAdo0ZM 0Zjw59s0Itd28WeAmQwihzetcfqBVzZ7nDY_5hHn9_OxpQAZi2Ns9HHDBQoy xqn.6_IiOwlABAddDxSiV6Efr25997KWl8AHV_pzsRmNRYHOyXwExqiioB_y Ci.mytZCqKhhUR3jYc9oLJ4M2EUj9pPQqDCrY0c01dr275_ukd0Ow21BDi8a .pg-- Received: from [194.168.202.210] by web133201.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:20:51 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.122.442 References: <5064A4DC.5090304@turnkey.bz> <5064AD5C.4010403@boreham.org> <5064AF52.3070706@turnkey.bz> <5064B34D.2000105@boreham.org> <5065C8DC.5020305@boreham.org> <5065DF86.2030909@turnkey.bz> Message-ID: <1349166051.57109.YahooMailNeo@web133201.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 09:20:51 +0100 (BST) From: Glyn Astill Reply-To: Glyn Astill Subject: Re: hardware advice To: "M. D." , "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" In-Reply-To: <5065DF86.2030909@turnkey.bz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pg-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++) X-Archive-Number: 201210/9 X-Sequence-Number: 47968 >________________________________=0A=0A> From: M. D. =0A>= To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org =0A>Sent: Friday, 28 September 2012, 1= 8:33=0A>Subject: Re: [PERFORM] hardware advice=0A> =0A>On 09/28/2012 09:57 = AM, David Boreham wrote:=0A>> On 9/28/2012 9:46 AM, Craig James wrote:=0A>>= > Your best warranty would be to have the confidence to do your own=0A>>> r= epairs, and to have the parts on hand.=A0 I'd seriously consider=0A>>> putt= ing your own system together.=A0 Maybe go to a few sites with=0A>>> pre-con= figured machines and see what parts they use.=A0 Order those,=0A>>> screw t= he thing together yourself, and put a spare of each critical=0A>>> part on = your shelf.=0A>>> =0A>> This is what I did for years, but after taking my o= ld parts collection to the landfill a few times, realized I may as well jus= t buy N+1 machines and keep zero spares on the shelf. That way I get a spar= e machine available for use immediately, and I know the parts are working (= parts on the shelf may be defective). If something breaks, I use the spare = machine until the replacement parts arrive.=0A>> =0A>> Note in addition tha= t a warranty can be extremely useful in certain organizations as a vehicle = of blame avoidance (this may be its primary purpose in fact). If I buy a bu= nch of machines that turn out to have buggy NICs, well that's my fault and = I can kick myself since I own the company, stay up late into the night read= ing kernel code, and buy new NICs. If I have an evil Dilbertian boss, then = well...I'd be seriously thinking about buying Dell boxes in order to blame = Dell rather than myself, and be able to say "everything is warrantied" if b= adness goes down. Just saying...=0A>> =0A>I'm kinda in the latter shoes.=A0= Dell is the only thing that is trusted in my organisation.=A0 If I would b= uild my own, I would be fully blamed for anything going wrong in the next 3= years. Thanks everyone for your input.=A0 Now my final choice will be if m= y budget allows for the latest and fastest, else I'm going for the x5690.= =A0 I don't have hundreds of users, so I think the x5690 should do a pretty= good job handling the load.=0A>=0A>=0A=0AHaving=0Aplenty experience with D= ell I'd urge you reconsider.=A0 All the Dell servers=0Awe've had have arriv= ed hideously misconfigured, and tech support gets you=0Anowhere.=A0 Once we= 've rejigged the hardware ourselves, maybe replacing a=0Apart or two they'v= e performed okay.=0A=A0=0AReliability has been okay, however one of our=0An= ewer R910s recently all of a sudden went dead to the world; no prior sympto= ms=0Ashowing in our hardware and software monitoring, no errors in the os l= ogs,=0Anothing in the dell drac logs.=A0 After a hard reset it's back up as= if=0Anothing happened, and it's an issue I'm none the wiser to the cause.= =A0 Not=0Agood piece of mind.=0A=A0=0ALook around and find another vendor, = even if=0Ayour company has to pay more for you to have that blame avoidance= .