Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rocron@pssd.com>) id 1TRqxi-0002w9-6l
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:57:02 +0000
Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rocron@pssd.com>) id 1TRqxe-0003Xz-9F
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:57:01 +0000
Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com)
	by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rocron@pssd.com>) id 1TRqxc-0005ts-AB
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:56:56 -0700
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: robcron <rocron@pssd.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Message-ID: <1351285016309-5729768.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1351283186158-5729764.post@n5.nabble.com>
References: <1351276200087-5729749.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<1901.1351281512@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1351283186158-5729764.post@n5.nabble.com>
Subject: Re: Slower Performance on Postgres 9.1.6 vs 8.2.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/)
X-Archive-Number: 201210/326
X-Sequence-Number: 48285

Okay, so I took EXPLAIN ANALYZE off and made sure that timing is on "psql" 
command \timing shows 

Timing = on

Run the query several times..

9.1.6 runs this query an average of 354 ms
8.2.11 runs this query an average of 437 ms

So 9.1 IS FASTER

Why is EXPLAIN ANALYZE showing the reverse...of that...?

Evidently, since I fixed the database Collation ( set to a value of "C") it
has been faster but I got locked into looking at the EXPLAIN ANALYZE
results...

MMMM very curious.

Rob



--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Slower-Performance-on-Postgres-9-1-6-vs-8-2-11-tp5729749p5729768.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.