Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTDDE-0000wV-Nx for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:54:40 +0000 Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTDDA-0000Cv-3b for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:54:40 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTDD7-0008Tz-1B for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:54:33 -0700 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:54:33 -0700 (PDT) From: AndyG To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: <1351608872327-5730059.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <508F82E1.3020202@orprovision.com> Subject: Re: Slow query, where am I going wrong? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Archive-Number: 201210/383 X-Sequence-Number: 48342 A marginal improvement. http://explain.depesz.com/s/y63 I am going to normalize the table some more before partitioning. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Slow-query-where-am-I-going-wrong-tp5730015p5730059.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.