Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7307F9F93F2 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 14:30:35 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32615-09 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 14:30:31 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6749F9478 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 14:30:31 -0400 (AST) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IokEu-0000wA-1A for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:30:28 -0800 Message-ID: <13576252.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 10:30:28 -0800 (PST) From: smiley2211 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Postgresql.conf Settings In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: smiley2211@yahoo.com References: <13575017.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.158 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=-1.028, BAYES_20=-0.74, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=2.297, WHOIS_MYPRIVREG=1.499 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Archive-Number: 200711/49 X-Sequence-Number: 27464 Scott, Thanks for responding...I've posted all that information before and tried all the suggestions but the query is still taking over 1 hour to complete :(...I just wanted to possible hear what others have say 'effective cache', 'shared_buffers' etc set to... Thanks...Marsha Scott Marlowe-2 wrote: > > On 11/4/07, smiley2211 wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> What are the ideal settings for values in this postgresql.conf file??? I >> have tried so many parameter changes but I still can not get the 8.1.4 >> version to perform as well as the 7.x version...what do others have their >> postgrsql.conf file values set to??? > > Without knowing what query you're trying to run it's hard to say. > > Can you post the explain analyze output for the query in both 7.x and 8.1? > >> Are there any known performance degrades going from 7.x to 8.1 >> versions??? > > The only one I know of is if you try to do something like: > > select * from table1 t1 left join table2 t2 on (t1.id=t2.id) where t2.id > is null > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Postgresql.conf-Settings-tf4747486.html#a13576252 Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.