Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD9A9FBA1C for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:52:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00944-06 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:51:45 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743599FB9EB for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:51:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9BEpZR1013679; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:51:35 -0400 (EDT) To: henk de wit cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to henk de wit message dated "Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:04:38 +0200" Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:51:35 -0400 Message-ID: <13678.1192114295@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/130 X-Sequence-Number: 27152 henk de wit writes: > ERROR: out of memory > DETAIL: Failed on request of size 4194304. This error should have produced a map of per-context memory use in the postmaster log. Please show us that. regards, tom lane