Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8008564FEAF
	for <pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:29:49 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 44656-01 for
	<pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:29:46 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDDB64FC00
	for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:29:46 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m9GETiHK014315;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:29:44 -0400 (EDT)
To: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it>
cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: further tests with 8.3 was: Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL -
	performance issues?
In-reply-to: <20081016160756.79d6a771@dawn.webthatworks.it> 
References: <2434A118-CEFA-43A9-BA88-006EC1F80326@hoegh.org>
	<200810122214.53558.uwe@oss4u.com>
	<20081013090228.248a665f@dawn.webthatworks.it>
	<e7e0a2570810131945x1bbf10b8r67c0ac2a340b436f@mail.gmail.com>
	<20081014114011.0ebe495a@dawn.webthatworks.it>
	<dcc563d10810140556v399ce9ddq94e9c88da2b8a742@mail.gmail.com>
	<20081014184456.0b920620@dawn.webthatworks.it>
	<20081016160756.79d6a771@dawn.webthatworks.it>
Comments: In-reply-to Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it>
	message dated "Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:07:56 +0200"
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:29:44 -0400
Message-ID: <14314.1224167384@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200810/679
X-Sequence-Number: 138928

Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it> writes:
> I wonder if pg is using ssl even on sockets.

No, it won't do that.

			regards, tom lane