Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvvwz-0002sQ-Ta for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 01:11:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvvwz-00068D-GV for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 01:11:01 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvvwy-0005zD-2L for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 01:11:00 +0000 Received: from mwork.nabble.com ([162.253.133.43]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvvwv-0001Pn-F2 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 01:10:58 +0000 Received: from mben.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.72]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2AB37BD402A for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 18:10:56 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 18:10:56 -0700 (MST) From: rverghese To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: <1491441056780-5954521.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <10942.1491440905@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <1491432671098-5954485.post@n3.nabble.com> <5326.1491434397@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1491436440096-5954503.post@n3.nabble.com> <1491438412093-5954509.post@n3.nabble.com> <10942.1491440905@sss.pgh.pa.us> Subject: Re: -EXT-Re: Table not using tsvector gin index and performance much worse than when it uses it. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org Yup, I just found the per index option. Pretty cool. Will see what value is optimal... Thanks RV -- View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/Table-not-using-tsvector-gin-index-and-performance-much-worse-than-when-it-uses-it-tp5954485p5954521.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance