Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZIc6-0001qn-QR for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:48:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZIc6-00071R-7s for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:48:26 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZIc5-00071D-Tf for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:48:26 +0000 Received: from n3.nabble.com ([162.255.23.22]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eZIby-00069e-AY for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:48:24 +0000 Received: from n3.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n3.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC418A936169 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:16 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:16 -0700 (MST) From: Isabella Ghiurea To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: <1515599296900-0.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20b07dd9-ab4e-5d48-6fbd-66e1d9161524@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca> Subject: RE: PG 9.5 2 tables same DDL with diff size MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk I run full vacuum and reindex on largest table (50GB) while there was no server activities so I assume no transaction was holding a lock on table since the full vacuum was able to run, anything where I should consider looking ? -- Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html