Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-performance-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1eeE0e-0003Cw-Rr
	for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 05:54:08 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-performance-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1eeE0d-0007jp-Fy
	for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 05:54:07 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <pavan.postgresdba@gmail.com>)
	id 1eeE0d-0007je-5s
	for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 05:54:07 +0000
Received: from n3.nabble.com ([162.255.23.22])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pavan.postgresdba@gmail.com>)
	id 1eeE0a-0002bB-2r
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 05:54:05 +0000
Received: from n3.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by n3.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FEBACCFFF2
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:54:01 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:54:01 -0700 (MST)
From: pavan95 <pavan.postgresdba@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Message-ID: <1516773241904-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADtiZxoNT4Fq01LfLVota6S_7hsHT2L0KEimozOCGJwqmFRvzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADtiZxoNT4Fq01LfLVota6S_7hsHT2L0KEimozOCGJwqmFRvzA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: need help on memory allocation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: <pgsql-performance.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-performance>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Rambabu,

If you are finding some <IDLE> sessions then of course your database is
perfectly alright. As <IDLE> sessions won't consume any memory.

Kindly specify the issue briefly.

Regards,
Pavan



--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html