Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-performance-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1egWOP-0008LX-BC
	for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:56:09 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-performance-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1egWON-00076v-9q
	for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:56:07 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <pavan.postgresdba@gmail.com>)
	id 1egWON-00076l-2k
	for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:56:07 +0000
Received: from n3.nabble.com ([162.255.23.22])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pavan.postgresdba@gmail.com>)
	id 1egWOF-0001je-FJ
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:56:06 +0000
Received: from n3.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by n3.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B7FAE56A75
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 06:55:57 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 06:55:57 -0700 (MST)
From: pavan95 <pavan.postgresdba@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Message-ID: <1517320557066-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACh9nsYFjrF9xPuQSkc_ffDz4-7CMHabLfZrMs5AXMEzsZwt6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1516776879945-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
 <CAGTBQpa-mTQ9qA18xVimrgTmrXZnFAnqKpzHYwCNtc=GEEd+5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <1516794633075-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
 <CAGTBQpbDRmAaiveO2bDOtXhdBJBqcgvfzmp69=XKDJ3mKcQCHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACh9nsYDjR817FpH+gs_81WtcOSRyc_0SU_VZM9haOm_b4wOGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180124151920.vonyeexv7qqledjy@alvherre.pgsql>
 <1516852035576-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
 <20180125213010.2tdsha5npaegvzpo@alvherre.pgsql>
 <CACh9nsY=c=-Ne_NU-jrT+qAL9hRbUM3USOCr_nRiPskDeAYWkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACh9nsYFjrF9xPuQSkc_ffDz4-7CMHabLfZrMs5AXMEzsZwt6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: <pgsql-performance.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-performance>
Precedence: bulk

Hello all,

Will a sudden restart(stop/start) of a postgres database will generate this
huge WAL?

Regards,
Pavan








--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html