Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gzoyZ-0008Lm-0x for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:41:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gzoyX-0000lf-GO for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:41:45 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gzoyX-0000lS-5X for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:41:45 +0000 Received: from n3.nabble.com ([162.255.23.22]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gzoyT-0003A5-3R for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:41:43 +0000 Received: from n3.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n3.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD19D1253156E for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 13:41:38 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 13:41:38 -0700 (MST) From: legrand legrand To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: <1551472898802-0.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <614c71eb156f49f696018916353fe454@PCYINTPEXMU001.NEOPROD.EDF.FR> References: <716d29c0713049e98cb80faff31db103@PCYINTPEXMU001.NEOPROD.EDF.FR> <20190228161900.GV28750@telsasoft.com> <30904.1551457782@sss.pgh.pa.us> <614c71eb156f49f696018916353fe454@PCYINTPEXMU001.NEOPROD.EDF.FR> Subject: RE: How to get the content of Bind variables MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Hi Didier, I imagine that this is the sql executed from a trigger. Could you provide the trigger pl/pgsql code ? as the source and target tables (anonymized) definition ? After a fresh db restart, are thoses logs the same for the 6 first executions and the following ones ? Regards PAscal -- Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html