X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D83DD8077 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:16:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22707-07 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 02:16:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33381D7A26 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:16:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7U2GKt7016377; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:16:20 -0400 (EDT) To: Carlos Henrique Reimer Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: shared buffers In-reply-to: <20050830015454.54152.qmail@web53204.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050830015454.54152.qmail@web53204.mail.yahoo.com> Comments: In-reply-to Carlos Henrique Reimer message dated "Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:54:54 -0300" Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:16:20 -0400 Message-ID: <16376.1125368180@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200508/507 X-Sequence-Number: 14254 Carlos Henrique Reimer writes: > I heard something about that Redhat 9 canīt handle very well RAM higher than 2GB. Is it right? RHL 9 is certainly pretty long in the tooth. Why aren't you using a more recent distro? regards, tom lane