Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06ED9FA2FC
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  4 Dec 2006 10:53:58 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 89139-08 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  4 Dec 2006 10:53:34 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0047A9FA2E0
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  4 Dec 2006 10:53:45 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kB4Eri3N016697;
	Mon, 4 Dec 2006 09:53:44 -0500 (EST)
To: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 8.2rc1 (much) slower than 8.2dev? 
In-reply-to: <4573D1F7.600@tweakers.net> 
References: <4573D1F7.600@tweakers.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
	message dated "Mon, 04 Dec 2006 08:44:55 +0100"
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:53:44 -0500
Message-ID: <16696.1165244024@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200612/44
X-Sequence-Number: 22100

Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net> writes:
> I'll run another analyze on the database to see if that makes any 
> difference, but after that I'm not sure what to check first to figure 
> out where things go wrong?

Look for changes in plans?

			regards, tom lane