Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C886330C4 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:21:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31664-06 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:21:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1544632308 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:21:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o5AFLAFr016910; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:21:10 -0400 (EDT) To: Max Williams cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4? In-reply-to: <0357196CB603794BB76F4F6B373F27330506EACE55@SERVER.ddnglobal.local> References: <0357196CB603794BB76F4F6B373F27330506EACE45@SERVER.ddnglobal.local> <1276158598.5764.22.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org> <0357196CB603794BB76F4F6B373F27330506EACE51@SERVER.ddnglobal.local> <15383.1276179056@sss.pgh.pa.us> <0357196CB603794BB76F4F6B373F27330506EACE55@SERVER.ddnglobal.local> Comments: In-reply-to Max Williams message dated "Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:09:02 +0100" Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:21:10 -0400 Message-ID: <16909.1276183270@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.484 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_05=-0.5, PLING_QUERY=0.994, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201006/163 X-Sequence-Number: 39019 Max Williams writes: > I'm afraid pg_config is not part of the pgdg packages. Sure it is. They might've put it in the -devel subpackage, though. regards, tom lane