Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6E364FC46 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:49:00 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42661-09 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:48:57 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7442E64FC44 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:48:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mBE5mihI017392; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:48:45 -0500 (EST) To: "Scott Marlowe" cc: jd@commandprompt.com, david@lang.hm, "Robert Haas" , "Scott Carey" , "Jean-David Beyer" , "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing In-reply-to: References: <1228846285.13962.42.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org> <603c8f070812130522l7ccfe9ccx6118c4171f4187d5@mail.gmail.com> <1229193463.7198.224.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org> <1229197659.7198.233.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org> <1229198629.7198.239.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org> Comments: In-reply-to "Scott Marlowe" message dated "Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:16:22 -0700" Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:48:44 -0500 Message-ID: <17391.1229233724@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200812/153 X-Sequence-Number: 32189 "Scott Marlowe" writes: > Isn't it amazing how many small businesses won't buy from other small > businesses? It's entertaining that Dell is considered one of the "safe choices" in this thread. They were a pretty small business not so long ago (and remain a lot smaller than IBM or HP) ... regards, tom lane