Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684D69FC8CB for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:22:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89775-02-3 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:22:05 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D199FC761 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:21:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9PGLrlG017407; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:21:53 -0400 (EDT) To: Jean-David Beyer cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Bunching "transactions" In-reply-to: <4720B680.5060407@verizon.net> References: <4720B680.5060407@verizon.net> Comments: In-reply-to Jean-David Beyer message dated "Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:30:08 -0400" Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:21:53 -0400 Message-ID: <17406.1193329313@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/282 X-Sequence-Number: 27304 Jean-David Beyer writes: > But what is the limitation on such a thing? AFAIR, the only limit on the size of a transaction is 2^32 commands (due to CommandCounter being 32 bits). regards, tom lane