X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC10752E60
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:05:48 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 24697-07
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:05:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D4552E65
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:05:45 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7JD5loZ017465;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:05:48 -0400 (EDT)
To: Kari Lavikka <tuner@bdb.fi>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, rjpeace@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Finding bottleneck 
In-reply-to: <Pine.HPX.4.62.0508191413480.3361@purple.bdb.fi> 
References: <6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD026@Herge.rcsinc.local>
	<Pine.HPX.4.62.0508081839420.3361@purple.bdb.fi>
	<29384.1123520200@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Pine.HPX.4.62.0508191413480.3361@purple.bdb.fi>
Comments: In-reply-to Kari Lavikka <tuner@bdb.fi>
	message dated "Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:34:47 +0300"
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:05:47 -0400
Message-ID: <17464.1124456747@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006]
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200508/257
X-Sequence-Number: 14004

Kari Lavikka <tuner@bdb.fi> writes:
> However, those configuration changes didn't have significant effect to 
> oprofile results. AtEOXact_CatCache consumes even more cycles.

I believe I've fixed that for 8.1.

			regards, tom lane