Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1762264FCCE for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:51:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79893-01 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:51:44 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8907F64FCD5 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:51:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m9V2pcWi018582; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:51:38 -0400 (EDT) To: Jeff Frost cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Index usage problem on 8.3.3 In-reply-to: <490A71BD.7070303@frostconsultingllc.com> References: <490A4EBE.9030804@frostconsultingllc.com> <13272.1225413116@sss.pgh.pa.us> <490A56C1.8020804@frostconsultingllc.com> <14519.1225415657@sss.pgh.pa.us> <490A5DCB.9060403@frostconsultingllc.com> <14766.1225416478@sss.pgh.pa.us> <15839.1225418158@sss.pgh.pa.us> <490A71BD.7070303@frostconsultingllc.com> Comments: In-reply-to Jeff Frost message dated "Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:47:25 -0700" Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:51:38 -0400 Message-ID: <18581.1225421498@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200810/145 X-Sequence-Number: 31726 Jeff Frost writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Huh. That does sound like it's a version-to-version difference. >> There's nothing in the CVS log that seems related though. Are you >> willing to post your test case? >> > It's a customer DB, so I'll contact them and see if we can boil it down > to a test case with no sensitive data. Well, if there was a change it seems to have been in the right direction ;-) so this is mostly just idle curiosity. Don't jump through hoops to get a test case. regards, tom lane