pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
9.6 write time
5+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* 9.6 write time
@ 2021-12-28 16:52 Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
  2021-12-28 17:46 ` Re: 9.6 write time Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread

From: Marc Millas @ 2021-12-28 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-performance

Hi,

I am looking at a postgres 9.6 on rh7
I see that checkpoint_write_time is huge which looks quite strange as the
average amount of data written is not that big.
For example in 5:30 hours today, data from pg_stat_bgwriter view, comparing
values at 11AM and 4h30PM :
checkpoint_write_time 6986324
buffers_checkpoint 182447

so, to my understanding, it takes almost 2 hours to write 1.6 GB of data.

Can someone either correct my understanding, or shed some light on what can
cause this ??

thanks,


Marc MILLAS
Senior Architect
+33607850334
www.mokadb.com

^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: 9.6 write time
  2021-12-28 16:52 9.6 write time Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
@ 2021-12-28 17:46 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  2021-12-28 17:55   ` Re: 9.6 write time Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2021-12-28 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>; +Cc: pgsql-performance

Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com> writes:
> I am looking at a postgres 9.6 on rh7
> I see that checkpoint_write_time is huge which looks quite strange as the
> average amount of data written is not that big.

checkpoint_write_time is not the amount of time spent doing I/O;
it's the elapsed wall-clock time in the write phase.  If the I/O
is being throttled because of an un-aggressive checkpoint completion
target, it could be a lot more than the actual I/O time.  What have
you got your checkpoint parameters set to?

			regards, tom lane





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: 9.6 write time
  2021-12-28 16:52 9.6 write time Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
  2021-12-28 17:46 ` Re: 9.6 write time Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
@ 2021-12-28 17:55   ` Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
  2021-12-28 18:34     ` Re: 9.6 write time Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread

From: Marc Millas @ 2021-12-28 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-performance

Hi Tom,

checkpoint completion target is 0.9

Marc MILLAS
Senior Architect
+33607850334
www.mokadb.com



On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 6:46 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com> writes:
> > I am looking at a postgres 9.6 on rh7
> > I see that checkpoint_write_time is huge which looks quite strange as the
> > average amount of data written is not that big.
>
> checkpoint_write_time is not the amount of time spent doing I/O;
> it's the elapsed wall-clock time in the write phase.  If the I/O
> is being throttled because of an un-aggressive checkpoint completion
> target, it could be a lot more than the actual I/O time.  What have
> you got your checkpoint parameters set to?
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>

^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: 9.6 write time
  2021-12-28 16:52 9.6 write time Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
  2021-12-28 17:46 ` Re: 9.6 write time Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  2021-12-28 17:55   ` Re: 9.6 write time Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
@ 2021-12-28 18:34     ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  2021-12-28 18:59       ` Re: 9.6 write time Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2021-12-28 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>; +Cc: pgsql-performance

Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com> writes:
> checkpoint completion target is 0.9

checkpoint_timeout is the more interesting number here.

			regards, tom lane





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: 9.6 write time
  2021-12-28 16:52 9.6 write time Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
  2021-12-28 17:46 ` Re: 9.6 write time Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  2021-12-28 17:55   ` Re: 9.6 write time Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
  2021-12-28 18:34     ` Re: 9.6 write time Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
@ 2021-12-28 18:59       ` Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread

From: Marc Millas @ 2021-12-28 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-performance

Default ie. 5 minutes

Le mar. 28 déc. 2021 à 19:34, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit :

> Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com> writes:
> > checkpoint completion target is 0.9
>
> checkpoint_timeout is the more interesting number here.
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>

^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-28 18:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-28 16:52 9.6 write time Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
2021-12-28 17:46 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2021-12-28 17:55   ` Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>
2021-12-28 18:34     ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2021-12-28 18:59       ` Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox