Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8F264FCE7 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:38:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34808-01-4 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:38:19 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C716505E9 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:38:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6BJc1Qf019252; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:38:01 -0400 (EDT) To: Karl Wright cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: REINDEX/SELECT deadlock? In-reply-to: <4877918E.7030308@metacarta.com> References: <4877918E.7030308@metacarta.com> Comments: In-reply-to Karl Wright message dated "Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:59:58 -0400" Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:38:01 -0400 Message-ID: <19251.1215805081@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/106 X-Sequence-Number: 30706 Karl Wright writes: > I just noticed what looks like a deadlock situation on postgresql > 8.2.4. Did you look into pg_locks to see what locks those transactions have and are waiting for? regards, tom lane