Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399D26321D9 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:29:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17936-01 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:29:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from web110705.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web110705.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.13.212]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 749716321B1 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:29:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 83998 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jun 2010 15:29:30 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1275492570; bh=Lm4N5zuRmwsEMeRRbG8gBIiT8gzmRcNAlugYTWsYrAs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Sk4bbdF351Ln8Jwrf1upKD0o/q4kC8LgtGK3vDNFsqPJVTyoqa57fwqOnGVrcDZEjKTNJb5SqF7ofuR5qcMBJTEwrkMT/dBIonl+oEt5zb5WHwXwgLVMr5cS+VTL+lb1KhltnM+rhBPi/sfbfZT+BY/NT0h7a3BXPeNOogbosjA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ol3Kh0jBQ8+1BIBfB2/d+BZ/tHL1lu+83nKBVR8q9e7IjIapCEtuCVtXaqGfQ4bqLZ33WE8h1Apipgt4KzQjPih2t38jjvQblAwRAndFFune+Iav4/uNwwcr8Ba1rf5nLAcbcJ4LXzmJ7ewx4gfb+3vECSDqi9BFY/2a1Q6CgoU=; Message-ID: <194051.67752.qm@web110705.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: KKJ2YDEVM1mUmW5mE9jl7XNVAUwWT7jZ3Zd7KCKKayz7Krs pArTrm0wbdiF8yc6t_g3dNVUc5e0rAjELpHQgPVNWmQYmtwC61mXo8_mFaMp Y2cjt4_VcGqJNDWg2F6oJ2tkPl.cbSrIoLGLJrcmLz8UgslQAiOnXRJ8mJlz V.qY309CnhHteH2UMRB04oU7eyGSSyhKaadX4SekpmsIyBo6Fb606lB0RoI6 xEln8L.UHFd1NJk0DLlrYkeZXnrJjmVEVTlYOXkbPYMPo.e_sQfO3rvvz8h4 plkz4YCmhfXonz7FppKphJgfURxNlXXZYY7q6Xm9zTWDHEmr5lBUdwnLlrBG C6MlQUKa2hwmHsE05sJMmDazvEkh5jdgB9w-- Received: from [58.34.43.64] by web110705.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:29:30 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.103.269680 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 08:29:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Wales Wang Subject: Re: File system choice for Red Hat systems To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Alan Hodgson In-Reply-To: <201006020753.29078@hal.medialogik.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.011 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201006/27 X-Sequence-Number: 38883 you can try Scientific Linux 5.x,it plus XFS and some other soft for HPC ba= sed on CentOS. It had XFS for years --- On Wed, 6/2/10, Alan Hodgson wrote: > From: Alan Hodgson > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] File system choice for Red Hat systems > To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org > Date: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 10:53 PM > On Tuesday 01 June 2010, Mark > Kirkwood >=20 > wrote: > > I'm helping set up a Red Hat 5.5 system for Postgres. > I was going to > > recommend xfs for the filesystem - however it seems > that xfs is > > supported as a technology preview "layered product" > for 5.5. This > > apparently means that the xfs tools are only available > via special > > channels. > >=20 > > What are Red Hat using people choosing for a good > performing filesystem? > >=20 >=20 > I've run PostgreSQL on XFS on CentOS for years. It works > well. Make sure you=20 > have a good battery-backed RAID controller under it (true > for all=20 > filesystems). >=20 > --=20 > "No animals were harmed in the recording of this episode. > We tried but that=20 > damn monkey was just too fast." >=20 > --=20 > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org= ) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance > =0A=0A