Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD34B5DBC8 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 10:12:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15420-03 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:11:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mta1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net (mta1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net [78.47.55.244]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FE0B5DBBF for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 10:11:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285C0A093 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:11:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mta1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net Received: from mta1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZeJ6RC8r1RPs for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:11:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from store1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net (store1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net [78.47.55.243]) by mta1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544E0A092 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:11:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:11:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Brandl To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: <19854296.27.1312290711562.JavaMail.root@store1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net> In-Reply-To: <6332413.23.1312290008254.JavaMail.root@store1.zcs.ext.wpsrv.net> Subject: Re: Array access performance MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.13_GA_2918 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.13_GA_2918) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201108/21 X-Sequence-Number: 44468 > Is this also true for postgres' arrays? Sorry, I'm using latest postgres 9.0.4 on debian squeeze/amd64. Greetings Andreas