X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8109DCCC4 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:40:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23585-02 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:40:23 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.196]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AE59DCCC3 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:40:20 -0400 (AST) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s14so530646wxc for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:40:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=rLxqVBOPgefeuU5tpa8ka9nXq6+kamXQXInaq9S1Lph8ZJt1yTa8TFodgiDv/NSZVVQ+EYLU01R68xEX6QFbjlwvYlzG0ABv4x8LllA13t/cUQaieAWeP+xBiq7QynpuTIYjbpu15APJcyETrqerYbE7QmlkUygmZeJA1HcUZjs= Received: by 10.70.44.16 with SMTP id r16mr1394643wxr; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.84.7 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:40:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1d219a6f0512161140o2aad4256lf8e33fe65871f5a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:40:22 -0500 From: Chris Hoover To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: 8.1 - pg_autovacuum question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200512/404 X-Sequence-Number: 16225 In PostgreSQL 8.1, is the pg_autovacuum daemon affected by the vacuum_cost_* variables? I need to make sure that if we turn autovacuuming on when we upgrade to 8.1, we don't cause any i/o issues. Thanks, Chris