X-Original-To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A325475C15 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 14:48:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (unknown [209.10.40.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F38D475A45 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 14:48:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [66.219.92.2] (HELO temoku) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 2999138; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:48:45 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: Achilleus Mantzios Subject: Re: [SQL] 7.3 analyze & vacuum analyze problem Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:48:18 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200304301148.18322.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-22.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT_KMAIL autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/270 X-Sequence-Number: 1776 Achilleus, > I am afraid it is not so simple. > What i (unsuccessfully) implied is that=20 > dynacom=3D# VACUUM ANALYZE status ; > VACUUM > dynacom=3D# ANALYZE status ; > ANALYZE > dynacom=3D# You're right, that is mysterious. If you don't get a response from one of= =20 the major developers on this forum, I suggest that you post those EXPLAIN= =20 results to PGSQL-BUGS. --=20 -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco