X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1833329E8E for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:33:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58280-07 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:33:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from trofast.sesse.net (trofast.sesse.net [129.241.93.32]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48D9329E86 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:33:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1C7DQf-0000eO-00 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:33:05 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:33:05 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: PostgreSQL Performance List Subject: Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- Message-ID: <20040914133305.GB2118@uio.no> Mail-Followup-To: PostgreSQL Performance List References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.6 on a i686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/116 X-Sequence-Number: 8244 On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 02:42:20PM +0200, Leeuw van der, Tim wrote: > - PostgreSQL 7.3 running on CYGWIN with cygipc daemon Isn't this doomed to kill your performance anyhow? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/