X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75334537E3 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:50:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80019-09 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:49:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server227.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.227]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD1B53678 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:49:52 -0300 (ADT) X-EthosMedia-Virus-Scanned: no infections found Received: from [64.81.245.111] (account josh@agliodbs.com HELO temoku.sf.agliodbs.com) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 7264412; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:51:51 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: Dave Chapeskie Subject: Re: Index bloat problem? Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:55:01 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: pgsql-perform References: <20050421173855.76286.qmail@web51410.mail.yahoo.com> <200504211128.43937.josh@agliodbs.com> <20050421193305.GA84813@ddm.wox.org> In-Reply-To: <20050421193305.GA84813@ddm.wox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504211255.01510.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.048 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200504/593 X-Sequence-Number: 11990 Dave, > See http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-03/msg01465.php > for my thoughts on a non-blocking alternative to REINDEX. I got no > replies to that message. :-( Well, sometimes you have to be pushy. Say, "Hey, comments please?" The hackers list is about 75 posts a day, it's easy for people to lose track of stuff they meant to comment on. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco