pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedindex not used
9+ messages / 8 participants
[nested] [flat]
* index not used
@ 2005-04-21 19:05 Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Enrico Weigelt @ 2005-04-21 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-performance
Hi folks,
I'm doing a simple lookup in a small table by an unique id, and I'm
wondering, why explains tells me seqscan is used instead the key.
The table looks like:
id bigint primary key,
a varchar,
b varchar,
c varchar
and I'm quering: select * from foo where id = 2;
I've got only 15 records in this table, but I wanna have it as
fast as possible since its used (as a map between IDs and names)
for larger queries.
thx
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: contact@metux.de
cellphone: +49 174 7066481
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- DSL ab 0 Euro. -- statische IP -- UUCP -- Hosting -- Webshops --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: index not used
@ 2005-04-21 19:23 Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com>
parent: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Darcy Buskermolen @ 2005-04-21 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: weigelt@metux.de; +Cc: pgsql-performance
On Thursday 21 April 2005 12:05, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I'm doing a simple lookup in a small table by an unique id, and I'm
> wondering, why explains tells me seqscan is used instead the key.
>
> The table looks like:
>
> id bigint primary key,
> a varchar,
> b varchar,
> c varchar
>
> and I'm quering: select * from foo where id = 2;
>
> I've got only 15 records in this table, but I wanna have it as
> fast as possible since its used (as a map between IDs and names)
> for larger queries.
The over head to load the index, fetch the record in there, then check the
table for visibility and return the value, is far greater than just doing 15
compares in the original table.
>
>
> thx
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
http://www.wavefire.com
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: index not used
@ 2005-04-21 20:39 Litao Wu <litaowu@yahoo.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Litao Wu @ 2005-04-21 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-performance
If id is PK, the query shoudl return 1 row only...
--- Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I'm doing a simple lookup in a small table by an
> unique id, and I'm
> wondering, why explains tells me seqscan is used
> instead the key.
>
> The table looks like:
>
> id bigint primary key,
> a varchar,
> b varchar,
> c varchar
>
> and I'm quering: select * from foo where id = 2;
>
> I've got only 15 records in this table, but I wanna
> have it as
> fast as possible since its used (as a map between
> IDs and names)
> for larger queries.
>
>
> thx
> --
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service
>
> phone: +49 36207 519931 www:
> http://www.metux.de/
> fax: +49 36207 519932 email:
> contact@metux.de
> cellphone: +49 174 7066481
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- DSL ab 0 Euro. -- statische IP -- UUCP --
> Hosting -- Webshops --
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: index not used
@ 2005-04-21 21:15 Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
parent: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Szabo @ 2005-04-21 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>; +Cc: pgsql-performance
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> I'm doing a simple lookup in a small table by an unique id, and I'm
> wondering, why explains tells me seqscan is used instead the key.
>
> The table looks like:
>
> id bigint primary key,
> a varchar,
> b varchar,
> c varchar
>
> and I'm quering: select * from foo where id = 2;
>
> I've got only 15 records in this table, but I wanna have it as
> fast as possible since its used (as a map between IDs and names)
> for larger queries.
Two general things:
For 15 records, an index scan may not be faster. For simple tests
you can play with enable_seqscan to see, but for more complicated
queries it's a little harder to tell.
If you're using a version earlier than 8.0, you'll need to quote
or cast the value you're searching for due to problems with
cross-type comparisons (the 2 would be treated as int4).
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Index not used
@ 2016-06-16 07:58 meike.talbach@women-at-work.org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: meike.talbach@women-at-work.org @ 2016-06-16 07:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-performance
Hello,
I've a basic table with about 100K rows:
CREATE TABLE "public"."push_topic" (
"id" Serial PRIMARY KEY,
"guid" public.push_guid NOT NULL,
"authenticatorsending" Varchar(32) NOT NULL,
"authenticatorsubscription" Varchar(32) NOT NULL,
"countpushed" Integer NOT NULL,
"datecreated" timestamp NOT NULL,
"datelastpush" timestamp
)
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX push_topic_idx_topicguid ON push_topic
USING btree (guid)
When I query this through pgsql, the queries are fast as expected.
This is the query:
select * from push_topic where guid = 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'
And the plan:
Index Scan using push_topic_idx_topicguid on push_topic (cost=0.42..8.44 rows=1 width=103) (actual time=0.117..0.121 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((guid)::bpchar = 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'::bpchar)
Buffers: shared hit=3 read=1
Total runtime: 0.191 ms
However when I run the exact query through a different application (CodeSynthesis ORM) the query is very slow (~ 115ms logged)
I noted this is due to a sequential scan happening on the table instead of an index scan.
This is query plan in the log file:
LOG: plan:
DETAIL: {PLANNEDSTMT
:commandType 1
:queryId 0
:hasReturning false
:hasModifyingCTE false
:canSetTag true
:transientPlan false
:planTree
{SEQSCAN
:startup_cost 0.00
:total_cost 2877.58
:plan_rows 429
:plan_width 103
:targetlist (
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 1
:vartype 23
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 0
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 1
:location 7
}
:resno 1
:resname id
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 1
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 2
:vartype 16385
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 100
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 2
:location 26
}
:resno 2
:resname guid
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 2
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 3
:vartype 1043
:vartypmod 36
:varcollid 100
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 3
:location 47
}
:resno 3
:resname authenticatorsending
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 3
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 4
:vartype 1043
:vartypmod 36
:varcollid 100
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 4
:location 84
}
:resno 4
:resname authenticatorsubscription
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 4
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 5
:vartype 23
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 0
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 5
:location 126
}
:resno 5
:resname countpushed
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 5
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 6
:vartype 1114
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 0
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 6
:location 154
}
:resno 6
:resname datecreated
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 6
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 7
:vartype 1114
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 0
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 7
:location 182
}
:resno 7
:resname datelastpush
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 7
:resjunk false
}
)
:qual (
{OPEXPR
:opno 98
:opfuncid 67
:opresulttype 16
:opretset false
:opcollid 0
:inputcollid 100
:args (
{FUNCEXPR
:funcid 401
:funcresulttype 25
:funcretset false
:funcvariadic false
:funcformat 2
:funccollid 100
:inputcollid 100
:args (
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 2
:vartype 16385
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 100
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 2
:location 234
}
)
:location -1
}
{CONST
:consttype 25
:consttypmod -1
:constcollid 100
:constlen -1
:constbyval false
:constisnull false
:location -1
:constvalue 40 [ -96 0 0 0 48 48 53 51 54 49 69 56 45 51 51 69 65
45 49 70 48 69 45 66 50 49 55 45 67 57 49 66 52 65 67 55 66 67 69
54 ]
}
)
:location 254
}
)
:lefttree <>
:righttree <>
:initPlan <>
:extParam (b)
:allParam (b)
:scanrelid 1
}
:rtable (
{RTE
:alias <>
:eref
{ALIAS
:aliasname push_topic
:colnames ("id" "guid" "authenticatorsending" "authenticatorsubscript
ion" "countpushed" "datecreated" "datelastpush")
}
:rtekind 0
:relid 16393
:relkind r
:lateral false
:inh false
:inFromCl true
:requiredPerms 2
:checkAsUser 0
:selectedCols (b 9 10 11 12 13 14 15)
:modifiedCols (b)
}
)
:resultRelations <>
:utilityStmt <>
:subplans <>
:rewindPlanIDs (b)
:rowMarks <>
:relationOids (o 16393)
:invalItems <>
:nParamExec 0
}
STATEMENT: SELECT "push_topic"."id", "push_topic"."guid", "push_topic"."authenticatorsending", "push_topic"."authenticatorsubscription", "push_topic"."countpushed", "push_topic"."datecreated", "push_topic"."datelastpush" FROM "push_topic" WHERE "push_topic"."guid" = $1
LOG: duration: 115.498 ms execute query_mc_push_database_Topic: SELECT "push_topic"."id", "push_topic"."guid", "push_topic"."authenticatorsending", "push_topic"."authenticatorsubscription", "push_topic"."countpushed", "push_topic"."datecreated", "push_topic"."datelastpush" FROM "push_topic" WHERE "push_topic"."guid" = $1
Any idea how to solve this ?
Thank you
Meike
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Index not used
@ 2016-06-16 12:27 John Gorman <jgorman@eldocomp.com>
parent: meike.talbach@women-at-work.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Gorman @ 2016-06-16 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meike.talbach@women-at-work.org <meike.talbach@women-at-work.org>; pgsql-performance
When you run psql, are you running that on the application server or the database server? Does the application run on the same server as the database and how is the application connecting to the database (JDBC, ODBC, etc)?
In other words is there a difference in network time between the 2?
Also the queries are not exactly the same. With psql you use "select *" and the application specifies what columns it wants returned and the order to return them. Try running the exact query on both.
Regards
John
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of meike.talbach@women-at-work.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:59 AM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: [PERFORM] Index not used
Hello,
I've a basic table with about 100K rows:
CREATE TABLE "public"."push_topic" (
"id" Serial PRIMARY KEY,
"guid" public.push_guid NOT NULL,
"authenticatorsending" Varchar(32) NOT NULL,
"authenticatorsubscription" Varchar(32) NOT NULL,
"countpushed" Integer NOT NULL,
"datecreated" timestamp NOT NULL,
"datelastpush" timestamp
)
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX push_topic_idx_topicguid ON push_topic
USING btree (guid)
When I query this through pgsql, the queries are fast as expected.
This is the query:
select * from push_topic where guid = 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'
And the plan:
Index Scan using push_topic_idx_topicguid on push_topic (cost=0.42..8.44 rows=1 width=103) (actual time=0.117..0.121 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((guid)::bpchar = 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'::bpchar)
Buffers: shared hit=3 read=1
Total runtime: 0.191 ms
However when I run the exact query through a different application (CodeSynthesis ORM) the query is very slow (~ 115ms logged)
I noted this is due to a sequential scan happening on the table instead of an index scan.
This is query plan in the log file:
LOG: plan:
DETAIL: {PLANNEDSTMT
:commandType 1
:queryId 0
:hasReturning false
:hasModifyingCTE false
:canSetTag true
:transientPlan false
:planTree
{SEQSCAN
:startup_cost 0.00
:total_cost 2877.58
:plan_rows 429
:plan_width 103
:targetlist (
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 1
:vartype 23
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 0
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 1
:location 7
}
:resno 1
:resname id
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 1
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 2
:vartype 16385
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 100
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 2
:location 26
}
:resno 2
:resname guid
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 2
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 3
:vartype 1043
:vartypmod 36
:varcollid 100
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 3
:location 47
}
:resno 3
:resname authenticatorsending
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 3
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 4
:vartype 1043
:vartypmod 36
:varcollid 100
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 4
:location 84
}
:resno 4
:resname authenticatorsubscription
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 4
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 5
:vartype 23
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 0
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 5
:location 126
}
:resno 5
:resname countpushed
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 5
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 6
:vartype 1114
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 0
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 6
:location 154
}
:resno 6
:resname datecreated
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 6
:resjunk false
}
{TARGETENTRY
:expr
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 7
:vartype 1114
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 0
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 7
:location 182
}
:resno 7
:resname datelastpush
:ressortgroupref 0
:resorigtbl 16393
:resorigcol 7
:resjunk false
}
)
:qual (
{OPEXPR
:opno 98
:opfuncid 67
:opresulttype 16
:opretset false
:opcollid 0
:inputcollid 100
:args (
{FUNCEXPR
:funcid 401
:funcresulttype 25
:funcretset false
:funcvariadic false
:funcformat 2
:funccollid 100
:inputcollid 100
:args (
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 2
:vartype 16385
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 100
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 2
:location 234
}
)
:location -1
}
{CONST
:consttype 25
:consttypmod -1
:constcollid 100
:constlen -1
:constbyval false
:constisnull false
:location -1
:constvalue 40 [ -96 0 0 0 48 48 53 51 54 49 69 56 45 51 51 69 65
45 49 70 48 69 45 66 50 49 55 45 67 57 49 66 52 65 67 55 66 67 69
54 ]
}
)
:location 254
}
)
:lefttree <>
:righttree <>
:initPlan <>
:extParam (b)
:allParam (b)
:scanrelid 1
}
:rtable (
{RTE
:alias <>
:eref
{ALIAS
:aliasname push_topic
:colnames ("id" "guid" "authenticatorsending" "authenticatorsubscript
ion" "countpushed" "datecreated" "datelastpush")
}
:rtekind 0
:relid 16393
:relkind r
:lateral false
:inh false
:inFromCl true
:requiredPerms 2
:checkAsUser 0
:selectedCols (b 9 10 11 12 13 14 15)
:modifiedCols (b)
}
)
:resultRelations <>
:utilityStmt <>
:subplans <>
:rewindPlanIDs (b)
:rowMarks <>
:relationOids (o 16393)
:invalItems <>
:nParamExec 0
}
STATEMENT: SELECT "push_topic"."id", "push_topic"."guid", "push_topic"."authenticatorsending", "push_topic"."authenticatorsubscription", "push_topic"."countpushed", "push_topic"."datecreated", "push_topic"."datelastpush" FROM "push_topic" WHERE "push_topic"."guid" = $1
LOG: duration: 115.498 ms execute query_mc_push_database_Topic: SELECT "push_topic"."id", "push_topic"."guid", "push_topic"."authenticatorsending", "push_topic"."authenticatorsubscription", "push_topic"."countpushed", "push_topic"."datecreated", "push_topic"."datelastpush" FROM "push_topic" WHERE "push_topic"."guid" = $1
Any idea how to solve this ?
Thank you
Meike
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Index not used
@ 2016-06-16 15:05 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
parent: meike.talbach@women-at-work.org
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tom Lane @ 2016-06-16 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meike.talbach@women-at-work.org; +Cc: pgsql-performance
meike.talbach@women-at-work.org writes:
> When I query this through pgsql, the queries are fast as expected.
> select * from push_topic where guid = 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'
> Index Scan using push_topic_idx_topicguid on push_topic (cost=0.42..8.44 rows=1 width=103) (actual time=0.117..0.121 rows=1 loops=1)
> Index Cond: ((guid)::bpchar = 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'::bpchar)
> Buffers: shared hit=3 read=1
> Total runtime: 0.191 ms
> However when I run the exact query through a different application (CodeSynthesis ORM) the query is very slow (~ 115ms logged)
> I noted this is due to a sequential scan happening on the table instead of an index scan.
It looks like what that app is actually issuing is something different
from what you tested by hand, to wit
select * from push_topic where guid = 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'::text
which causes the comparison to be resolved as texteq not bpchareq, ie you
effectively have
select * from push_topic where guid::text = 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'::text
and that doesn't match a bpchar index. If you can't persuade the app to
label the comparison value as bpchar not text, the easiest fix would be
to create an additional index on "guid::text".
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Index not used
@ 2016-06-16 15:53 David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
parent: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David G. Johnston @ 2016-06-16 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-performance
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> meike.talbach@women-at-work.org writes:
> > When I query this through pgsql, the queries are fast as expected.
> > select * from push_topic where guid =
> 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'
> > Index Scan using push_topic_idx_topicguid on push_topic
> (cost=0.42..8.44 rows=1 width=103) (actual time=0.117..0.121 rows=1 loops=1)
> > Index Cond: ((guid)::bpchar =
> 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'::bpchar)
> > Buffers: shared hit=3 read=1
> > Total runtime: 0.191 ms
>
> > However when I run the exact query through a different application
> (CodeSynthesis ORM) the query is very slow (~ 115ms logged)
> > I noted this is due to a sequential scan happening on the table instead
> of an index scan.
>
> It looks like what that app is actually issuing is something different
> from what you tested by hand, to wit
>
> select * from push_topic where guid =
> 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'::text
>
> which causes the comparison to be resolved as texteq not bpchareq, ie you
> effectively have
>
> select * from push_topic where guid::text =
> 'DD748CCD-B8A4-3B9F-8F60-67F1F673CFE5'::text
>
> and that doesn't match a bpchar index. If you can't persuade the app to
> label the comparison value as bpchar not text, the easiest fix would be
> to create an additional index on "guid::text".
>
Or, better, persuade the app to label the value "
public.push_guid
" since that is the column's type...a type you haven't defined for us.
If you get to add explicit casts this should be easy...but I'm not familiar
with the framework you are using.
David J.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Index not used
@ 2016-06-19 09:59 meike.talbach@women-at-work.org
parent: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: meike.talbach@women-at-work.org @ 2016-06-19 09:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-performance
<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family: arial , helvetica , sans-serif;display: inline;">> ​Or, better, persuade the app to label the value "</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family: arial , helvetica , sans-serif;display: inline;">​</div>
<div>public.push_guid
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family: arial , helvetica , sans-serif;display: inline;">​" since that is the column's type​...a type you haven't defined for us. If you get to add explicit casts this should be easy...but I'm not familiar with the framework you are using.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family: arial , helvetica , sans-serif;display: inline;"> </div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family: arial , helvetica , sans-serif;display: inline;"> </div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family: arial , helvetica , sans-serif;display: inline;">push_guid was a CHARACTER(36) column. I ended up converting it to CHARACTER VARYING(36).</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family: arial , helvetica , sans-serif;display: inline;">Index is now being used and performance is as expected.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family: arial , helvetica , sans-serif;display: inline;"> </div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family: arial , helvetica , sans-serif;display: inline;">Thanks a lot</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family: arial , helvetica , sans-serif;display: inline;">Meike</div>
</div></div></body></html>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-19 09:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-21 19:05 index not used Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
2005-04-21 19:23 ` Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com>
2005-04-21 21:15 ` Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
2005-04-21 20:39 Re: index not used Litao Wu <litaowu@yahoo.com>
2016-06-16 07:58 Index not used meike.talbach@women-at-work.org
2016-06-16 12:27 ` Re: Index not used John Gorman <jgorman@eldocomp.com>
2016-06-16 15:05 ` Re: Index not used Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2016-06-16 15:53 ` Re: Index not used David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
2016-06-19 09:59 ` Re: Index not used meike.talbach@women-at-work.org
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox