X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87182528C9 for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 15:02:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82322-09 for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:01:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07C8528A7 for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 15:01:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from trofast.ipv6.sesse.net ([2001:700:300:dc03:20e:cff:fe36:a766] helo=trofast.sesse.net) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dadj3-0007WI-Fu for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:01:58 +0200 Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dadj3-0001U0-00 for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:01:57 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:01:57 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: "'pgsql-performance@postgresql.org'" Subject: Re: Need help to decide Mysql vs Postgres Message-ID: <20050524180157.GA5092@uio.no> Mail-Followup-To: "'pgsql-performance@postgresql.org'" References: <0C072E7CC947D511AC9600A0CC7341200256CF05@xeon400.tagaudit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0C072E7CC947D511AC9600A0CC7341200256CF05@xeon400.tagaudit.com> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.11.8 on a i686 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? --> http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.014 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200505/366 X-Sequence-Number: 12530 On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:56:54PM -0400, Amit V Shah wrote: > I took a look at this. I have a few concerns with bizgres though -- I am > using jetspeed portal engine and Hibernate as my O/R Mapping layer. If you have problems with performance, you might want to look into using JDBC directly instead of using Hibernate. I know groups of people who are rather less-than-happy with it performance-wise :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/