X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F95352944 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 13:19:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59178-08 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 16:19:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server227.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.227]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E232C5293D for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 13:19:30 -0300 (ADT) X-EthosMedia-Virus-Scanned: no infections found Received: from [63.195.55.98] (account josh@agliodbs.com HELO spooky) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 7421691; Mon, 30 May 2005 09:21:34 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: "Eric Lauzon" Subject: Re: Postgresql and xeon. Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 09:19:40 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505300919.40827.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.327 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, URIBL_SBL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200505/433 X-Sequence-Number: 12597 Eric, > What about xeon and postgresql, i have been told that > postgresql wouldn't perform as well when running > under xeon processors due to some cache trick that postgresql > uses? Search the archives of this list. This has been discussed ad nauseum. www.pgsql.ru -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco