X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC81052934 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:57:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35495-09 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:57:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476FE5292F for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:57:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from trofast.sesse.net ([129.241.93.32]) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DdPz2-0000qb-Fb for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:57:57 +0200 Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DdPz0-0006Yf-00 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:57:54 +0200 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:57:54 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: Postgresql Performance list Subject: Re: postgresql-8.0.1 performance tuning Message-ID: <20050601095754.GA24585@uio.no> Mail-Followup-To: Postgresql Performance list References: <1117201312.7060.6.camel@fandelm.ecommit.de> <429D47FD.7090501@streppone.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <429D47FD.7090501@streppone.it> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.11.8 on a i686 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? --> http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.022 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200506/11 X-Sequence-Number: 12649 On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:30:37AM +0200, Cosimo Streppone wrote: >>fsync = true > false Just setting fsync=false without considering the implications is a _bad_ idea... /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/