X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B5A52D31 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:21:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86615-08 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:20:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9C352C34 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:20:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([70.108.75.132]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IJM005XOD2X5Z60@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:20:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB79F6005EA for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:20:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (osgiliath [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14200-01-6 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:20:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B2E91600197; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:20:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:20:56 -0400 From: Michael Stone Subject: Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL? In-reply-to: <42D65778.7010500@p0f.net> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Mail-Followup-To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-id: <20050714132056.GU19080@mathom.us> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-disposition: inline X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 53 FF 38 00 E7 DD 0A 9C 84 52 84 C5 EE DF 7C 88 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mathom.us References: <1121322821.6719.0.camel@noodles> <758d5e7f05071401034665841c@mail.gmail.com> <42D65778.7010500@p0f.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.01 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200507/176 X-Sequence-Number: 13417 On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:15:52PM +0200, Grega Bremec wrote: >I'm curious as to what this means - did they have problems integrating >it into their toolchain or are there actual problems going on in jfs >currently? I've found jfs to be the least stable linux filesystem and won't allow it anywhere near an important system. YMMV. Mike Stone