From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com
Organization: Aglio Database Solutions
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Bayes
 module.
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:12:15 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
Cc: Matthew Schumacher <matt.s@aptalaska.net>
References: <42E80C28.2040608@aptalaska.net>
In-Reply-To: <42E80C28.2040608@aptalaska.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200507271712.15299.josh@agliodbs.com>

Matt,

> After playing with various indexes and what not I simply am unable to
> make this procedure perform any better. =A0Perhaps someone on the list can
> spot the bottleneck and reveal why this procedure isn't performing that
> well or ways to make it better.

Well, my first thought is that this is a pretty complicated procedure for=20
something you want to peform well.    Is all this logic really necessary?  =
=20
How does it get done for MySQL?

=2D-=20
=2D-Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco