X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1F352A23 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:43:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96143-09 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:43:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server227.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.227]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109D952848 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:43:22 -0300 (ADT) X-EthosMedia-Virus-Scanned: no infections found Received: from [64.81.245.111] (account josh@agliodbs.com HELO temoku.sf.agliodbs.com) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 7670339; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:45:33 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Performance problems on 4/8way Opteron (dualcore) HP DL585 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:46:10 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Dirk =?iso-8859-1?q?Lutzeb=E4ck?= , Sven Geisler References: <42EA5D18.9020204@aeccom.com> In-Reply-To: <42EA5D18.9020204@aeccom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507291046.10318.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.049 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200507/478 X-Sequence-Number: 13719 Dirk, > does anybody have expierence with this machine (4x 875 dual core Opteron > CPUs)? Nope. I suspect that you may be the first person to report in on dual-cores. There may be special compile issues with dual-cores that we've not yet encountered. > We run RHEL 3.0, 32bit and under high load it is a drag. We > mostly run memory demanding queries. Context switches are pretty much > around 20.000 on the average, no cs spikes when we run many processes in > parallel. Actually we only see two processes in running state! When > there are only a few processes running context switches go much higher. > At the moment we are much slower that with a 4way XEON box (DL580). Um, that was a bit incoherent. Are you seeing a CS storm or aren't you? -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco