X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B73DA257; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:24:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26004-09; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 18:23:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.clickdiario.com (mail.clickdiario.com [70.85.167.114]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3104FDA1A5; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:23:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.clickdiario.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EE510674; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:28:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.clickdiario.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.clickdiario.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30611-05; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:28:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cristian1 (unknown [216.230.158.50]) by mail.clickdiario.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6B0100E5; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:28:03 -0500 (CDT) From: "Cristian Prieto" To: , Subject: Text/Varchar performance... Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:21:35 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcXJ2Z4us8IFwjmGTVOiJdhYl6kVMA== Message-Id: <20051005182803.0E6B0100E5@mail.clickdiario.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at example.com X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.015 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200510/203 X-Sequence-Number: 84432 Hello, just a little question, It's preferable to use Text Fields or varchar(255) fields in a table? Are there any performance differences in the use of any of them? Thanks a lot for your answer!