X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80551DB1D0 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:58:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03722-10 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:58:47 +0000 (GMT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4B0DB178 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:58:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from trofast.ipv6.sesse.net ([2001:700:300:dc03:20e:cff:fe36:a766] helo=trofast.sesse.net) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EaGhB-0002Jg-Kr for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:58:47 +0100 Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EaGh9-0001dr-00 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:58:43 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:58:43 +0100 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: WAL sync behaviour Message-ID: <20051110175843.GA6254@uio.no> Mail-Followup-To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: <20051110133241.GA4031@uio.no> <437355C6.4030604@archonet.com> <20051110142535.GA4530@uio.no> <20051110144309.GO9905@mathom.us> <1131637958.3554.75.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <9791.1131640774@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1131642009.3554.87.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <10320.1131644655@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10320.1131644655@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.14 on a i686 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? --> http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.008 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.008] X-Spam-Score: 0.008 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/192 X-Sequence-Number: 15449 On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:44:15PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Don't think so ... want to write something up? Hard part is to > figure out where to put it ... To be honest, I think we could use a "newbie's guide to PostgreSQL performance tuning". I've seen rather good guides for query tuning, and guides for general performance tuning, but none that really cover both in a coherent way. (Also, many of the ones I've seen start getting rather dated; after bitmap index scans arrived, for instance, many of the rules with regard to index planning probably changed.) I'd guess http://www.powerpostgresql.com/PerfList is a rather good start for the second part (and it's AFAICS under a free license); having something like that in the docs (or some other document) would probably be a good start. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/