X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355F69DC99D
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:10:44 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 52209-01
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:10:42 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from svana.org (svana.org [125.62.94.225])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D2F9DC8DF
	for <pgsql-performance@postgreSQL.org>;
	Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:10:39 -0400 (AST)
Received: from kleptog by svana.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F02ai-0000t4-Fe; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:10:36 +1100
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:10:36 +0100
From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Stephan Vollmer <svollmer@gmx.de>, pgsql-performance@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow
Message-ID: <20060120201036.GE31908@svana.org>
Reply-To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
References: <43D0ED57.1020608@gmx.de> <17454.1137771321@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20060120170452.GC31908@svana.org> <26153.1137784469@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="veXX9dWIonWZEC6h"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <26153.1137784469@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-PGP-Key-ID: Length=1024; ID=0x0DC67BE6
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: 295F A899 A81A 156D B522  48A7 6394 F08A 0DC6 7BE6
X-PGP-Key-URL: <http://svana.org/kleptog/0DC67BE6.pgp.asc>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kleptog@svana.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on svana.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.13 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.130]
X-Spam-Score: 0.13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200601/359
X-Sequence-Number: 16837


--veXX9dWIonWZEC6h
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:14:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> [ thread moved to pgsql-performance ]
>=20
> I've obtained a gprof profile on Stephan's sample case (many thanks for
> providing the data, Stephan).  The command is

<snip>

Something I'm missing is the calls to tsearch functions. I'm not 100%
familiar with gprof, but is it possible those costs have been added
somewhere else because it's in a shared library? Perhaps the costs went
into FunctionCall1/3?

Have a nice day,
--=20
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

--veXX9dWIonWZEC6h
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD0UO8IB7bNG8LQkwRAu7FAKCAo1FpTvvZk3lsCsxh8EOtrsBiEACfTZZc
/UF8zOxBgBHaGtsL9z9r95o=
=eRRD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--veXX9dWIonWZEC6h--