X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41219DC97A for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:24:45 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91786-03 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:24:44 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from frank.wiles.org (frank.wiles.org [24.124.39.75]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610799DC8D9 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:24:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from kungfu (frank.wiles.org [127.0.0.1]) by frank.wiles.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id k0NHOW8Y008844; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:24:33 -0600 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:25:26 -0600 From: Frank Wiles To: "Dave Dutcher" Cc: mjs_ops@gmx.net, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures Message-Id: <20060123112526.1ee25dcd.frank@wiles.org> In-Reply-To: <000001c62039$579e88b0$8300a8c0@tridecap.com> References: <1138022845.949.26.camel@servidor> <000001c62039$579e88b0$8300a8c0@tridecap.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.1 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.065 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065] X-Spam-Score: 0.065 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/414 X-Sequence-Number: 16892 On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:23:17 -0600 "Dave Dutcher" wrote: > I don't think pgpool is what you need. If I understand pgpool > correctly, pgpool lets you pool multiple postgres servers together. > You are just looking for database connection pooling. While pgpool can let you pool together multiple backend servers, it also functions well as just a connection pooling device with only one backend. --------------------------------- Frank Wiles http://www.wiles.org ---------------------------------