X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED20F9DC85C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:57:58 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09518-05 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:58:02 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from alvh.no-ip.org (201-220-123-7.bk10-dsl.surnet.cl [201.220.123.7]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B4E9DC821 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:57:56 -0400 (AST) Received: by alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1CADBC2DC59; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:00:55 -0300 (CLST) Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:00:55 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Ron Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very Message-ID: <20060127010054.GD13501@surnet.cl> Mail-Followup-To: Ron , Tom Lane , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: <20060120213754.GG31908@svana.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20060120174141.039b03e8@earthlink.net> <6111.1137797436@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060120225751.GA27230@uio.no> <6532.1137801157@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060121000519.GA29755@uio.no> <6743.1137802990@sss.pgh.pa.us> <7.0.1.0.2.20060121064930.03aba810@earthlink.net> <18771.1137868073@sss.pgh.pa.us> <7.0.1.0.2.20060126190219.0388a918@earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060126190219.0388a918@earthlink.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.783 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.136, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.44] X-Spam-Score: 1.783 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200601/452 X-Sequence-Number: 16930 Ron wrote: > At 01:27 PM 1/21/2006, Tom Lane wrote: > >Ron writes: > >> At 07:23 PM 1/20/2006, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> Well, we're trying to split an index page that's gotten full into > >>> two index pages, preferably with approximately equal numbers of items in > >>> each new page (this isn't a hard requirement though). > After reading the various papers available on GiST and RD trees, I > think I have a decent suggestion. I for one don't understand what does your suggestion have to do with the problem at hand ... not that I have a better one myself. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/CTMLCN8V17R4 "Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra esté seca" (Orual)