From: Gorshkov <listsubscriptions@oghma.on.ca>
Organization: Oghma Systems
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Decide between Postgresql and Mysql (help of
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:01:59 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
References: <1143559902.1241.16.camel@servidor> <op.s642dpyecigqcu@apollo13>
	<1143575445.3625.87.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <1143575445.3625.87.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200603291901.59320.listsubscriptions@oghma.on.ca>
X-RECEIPT-TO[0]: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.03 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030]
X-Spam-Score: 0.03
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200603/594
X-Sequence-Number: 18031

On Tuesday 28 March 2006 14:50, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 13:42, PFC wrote:
> > > This is as much about the code in front of the database as the database
> > > itself.  You'll want to use an architecture that supports pooled
> > > connections (java, php under lighttpd, etc...) and you'll want to look
> >
> > 	Well, anybody who uses PHP and cares about performance is already using
> > lighttpd, no ?

/flame on
if you were *that* worried about performance, you wouldn't be using PHP or 
*any* interperted language
/flame off

sorry - couldn't resist it :-)