X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC62D11F6238 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:36:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25396-06 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:36:46 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB78A11F6208 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:36:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from trofast.ipv6.sesse.net ([2001:700:300:dc03:20e:cff:fe36:a766] helo=trofast.sesse.net) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FP5kx-0004lc-89 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:36:43 +0200 Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FP5ks-0004K0-00 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:36:38 +0200 Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:36:38 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Decide between Postgresql and Mysql (help of Message-ID: <20060330223638.GA16558@uio.no> Mail-Followup-To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: <1143559902.1241.16.camel@servidor> <1143575445.3625.87.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <200603291901.59320.listsubscriptions@oghma.on.ca> <442B4138.8030207@modgraph-usa.com> <60acb7rgnr.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com> <1143746489.26940.34.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.14.3 on a x86_64 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? --> http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.101 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.101] X-Spam-Score: 0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/632 X-Sequence-Number: 18069 On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 11:31:25PM +0200, PFC wrote: > So, one wonders why some use 70's languages like Java instead of > Lisp or Python, which are slower, but a lot more powerful and faster to > develop in... > (and don't have hibernate, which is a big bonus) > (why do you think I don't like Java ?) Python may not have Hibernate, but it has even worse stuff trying to do about the same thing. :-) Anyhow, this is rapidly becoming offtopic for the original thread. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/