X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E5611F7DDB for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:16:00 -0300 (ADT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Score: 2.83 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.83 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.679, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=0.879, RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID=2.151] Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DUxXYZ0ObrsT for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:15:53 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx1.ustc.edu.cn (ns.ustc.edu.cn [202.38.64.1]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E1B11F7DD3 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:15:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([210.45.75.71]) by mx1.ustc.edu.cn (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k3MCBrw02865; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:11:54 +0800 Received: from wfg by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1FXH1K-0001JG-Gz; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:15:26 +0800 Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:15:26 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: "Jim C. Nasby" Cc: Markus Schaber , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Introducing a new linux readahead framework Message-ID: <20060422121526.GA5021@mail.ustc.edu.cn> Mail-Followup-To: Wu Fengguang , "Jim C. Nasby" , Markus Schaber , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: <20060421013826.GA5217@mail.ustc.edu.cn> <20060421043147.GV49405@pervasive.com> <20060421071511.GA4885@mail.ustc.edu.cn> <44488F7E.6060704@logix-tt.com> <20060421122028.GA5937@mail.ustc.edu.cn> <20060421183423.GL49405@pervasive.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060421183423.GL49405@pervasive.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 X-Archive-Number: 200604/513 X-Sequence-Number: 18597 On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:34:24PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > IIRC Mark from OSDL said he'd try testing this when he gets a chance, > but you could also try running dbt2 and dbt3 against it. Thanks for the info, I'll look into them. Regards, wu