X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBF19FB1A5; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:41:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06575-07; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:41:27 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from noel.decibel.org (noel.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB999FADD1; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:41:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: by noel.decibel.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 27ED556427; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:41:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 1001); Thu, 11 May 2006 18:41:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:41:25 -0500 From: "Jim C. Nasby" To: Bruce Momjian Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , Vivek Khera , "Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail))" , PostgreSQL General Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Message-ID: <20060511234124.GC4268@pervasive.com> References: <4463BCE7.6090202@commandprompt.com> <200605112320.k4BNKR221040@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605112320.k4BNKR221040@candle.pha.pa.us> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p4 amd64 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Hashcash: 1:20:060511:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us::Et548zWqaeoMIxfc:000000000000000 0000000000000000000000004s/c X-Hashcash: 1:20:060511:jd@commandprompt.com::o2tIA4DKLRdxmmlJ:00000000000000000 00000000000000000000000012Mq X-Hashcash: 1:20:060511:vivek@khera.org::RCk/OzvfJI/Ze8FO:001PlP X-Hashcash: 1:20:060511:pgsql-performance@postgresql.org::y8ru1cjCsIIL33Rw:00000 0000000000000000000000001SBg X-Hashcash: 1:20:060511:pgsql-general@postgresql.org::+N8k/fQOW3yutWuq:000000000 0000000000000000000000003VFS X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200605/517 X-Sequence-Number: 95309 On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:20:27PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > >> You want an in-depth comparison of how a server disk drive is internally > > >> better than a desktop drive: > > >> > > >> http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf > > > > > > BTW, someone (Western Digital?) is now offering SATA drives that carry > > > the same MTBF/warranty/what-not as their SCSI drives. I can't remember > > > if they actually claim that it's the same mechanisms just with a > > > different controller on the drive... > > > > Well western digital and Seagate both carry 5 year warranties. Seagate I > > believe does on almost all of there products. WD you have to pick the > > right drive. > > That's nice, but it seems similar to my Toshiba laptop drive experience > --- it breaks, we replace it. I would rather not have to replace it. :-) > > Let me mention the only drive that has ever failed without warning was a > SCSI Deskstar (deathstar) drive, which was a hybrid because it was a > SCSI drive, but made for consumer use. My damn powerbook drive recently failed with very little warning, other than I did notice that disk activity seemed to be getting a bit slower. IIRC it didn't log any errors or anything. Even if it did, if the OS was catching them I'd hope it would pop up a warning or something. But from what I've heard, some drives now-a-days will silently remap dead sectors without telling the OS anything, which is great until you've used up all of the spare sectors and there's nowhere to remap to. :( Hmm... I should figure out how to have OS X email me daily log updates like FreeBSD does... -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461