Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:35:01 -0500
From: "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	soni de <soni.de@gmail.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Regarding pg_dump utility
Message-ID: <20060608163501.GT45331@pervasive.com>
References: <9f2e40a90606072309v4c5b2623k8bda2614cd575835@mail.gmail.com>
	<20060608151657.GL45331@pervasive.com>
	<20060608162327.GD17421@surnet.cl>
	<44885158.9020209@pse-consulting.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <44885158.9020209@pse-consulting.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 06:33:28PM +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >Personally I think it would be neat.  For example the admin-tool guys
> >would be able to get a dump without invoking an external program.
> >Second it would really be independent of core releases (other than being
> >tied to the output format.)  pg_dump would be just a simple caller of
> >such a library, and anyone else would be able to get dumps easily, in
> >whatever format.
> 
> pgAdmin currently invokes pg_dump/restore externally with pipes attached 
> to stdin/out/err, but a library implementation would solve some 
> headaches (esp. concerning portability) managing background 
> execution/GUI updates/process control. I'd like a libpgdumprestore 
> library, with pg_dump/pg_restore being lean wrapper programs.

Would a pg_dumpall library also make sense?
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461