X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997CD9FA5F8 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:15:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15078-06 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:15:17 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479979F9316 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:15:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id k5DJFDk06984; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:15:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200606131915.k5DJFDk06984@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? In-Reply-To: <448F0DE0.50509@boreham.org> To: david_list@boreham.org Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:15:13 -0400 (EDT) CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200606/195 X-Sequence-Number: 19552 David Boreham wrote: > > >My suggestion is to look at something like this: > > > >http://www.abmx.com/1u-supermicro-amd-opteron-rackmount-server-p-210.html > > > >1U rackmount opteron from Supermicro that can have two dual core > >opterons and 4 drives and up to 16 gigs of ram. Supermicro server > >motherboards have always treated me well and performed well too. > > > > > I've had good experience with similar machines from Tyan : > http://www.tyan.com/products/html/gt24b2891.html In fact I think Tyan makes the Supermicro motherboards. -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +