X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7A19FA605 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:59:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91820-08 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:59:29 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: delayed 00:13:04.815632 by SQLgrey- Received: from colo-dns-ext1.juniper.net (colo-dns-ext1.juniper.net [207.17.137.57]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCBC9FA147 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:59:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from merlot.juniper.net (merlot.juniper.net [172.17.27.10]) by colo-dns-ext1.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id k65NkNX60556 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:46:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kenjim@juniper.net) Received: from kenjim-lnx.juniper.net (kenjim-lnx.juniper.net [172.17.58.60]) by merlot.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id k65NkH572817; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:46:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kenjim@juniper.net) Received: from kenjim-lnx.juniper.net (kenjim-lnx.juniper.net [127.0.0.1]) by kenjim-lnx.juniper.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k65NkH4Q003090; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:46:17 -0700 Received: (from kenjim@localhost) by kenjim-lnx.juniper.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k65NkHDW003089; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:46:17 -0700 Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:46:17 -0700 From: Kenji Morishige To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Cc: kenjim@juniper.net Subject: suggested RAID controller for FreeBSD 6.1 + PostgreSQL 8.1 Message-ID: <20060705234617.GB2367@juniper.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200607/34 X-Sequence-Number: 19894 I am currently running FreeBSD 4.11 (due to IT requirements for now) and Adaptec's 2200S RAID controller running in RAID5. I was advised in the past that the 2200S is actually a poor performing controller and obviously the RAID5 is less than ideal for databases. I chose to run the controller in RAID5 as the tech I talked to suggested that the 2200S was primarily designed for RAID5 and it would operate the best that way. My server is a dual Xeon 3.06Ghz box running on a motherboard approximately 2-3 years old now. I'd like to know what an ideal RAID controller that would be compatible with FreeBSD 6.1 would be these days. Thanks in advance, Kenji