X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C119FB278 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:05:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71384-01 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:05:30 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from kenobi.snowman.net (kenobi.snowman.net [70.84.9.186]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C339FB24E for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:05:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: by kenobi.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D02D558045; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:05:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:05:29 -0400 From: Stephen Frost To: Alex Turner Cc: Alvaro Nunes Melo , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good enough Message-ID: <20060808120529.GL20016@kenobi.snowman.net> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Turner , Alvaro Nunes Melo , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: <44D7B958.6030004@atua.com.br> <33c6269f0608072333o67ab6adei29095091718901dc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dw7F2rfFuuIXZgJ2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <33c6269f0608072333o67ab6adei29095091718901dc@mail.gmail.com> X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ X-Info: http://www.snowman.net X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.16-2-vserver-686 (i686) X-Uptime: 07:54:38 up 44 days, 1:51, 14 users, load average: 1.77, 0.92, 0.74 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.223 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/97 X-Sequence-Number: 20282 --Dw7F2rfFuuIXZgJ2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline * Alex Turner (armtuk@gmail.com) wrote: > First off - very few third party tools support debian. Debian is a sure > fire way to have an unsupported system. Use RedHat or SuSe (flame me all > you want, it doesn't make it less true). Yeah, actually, it does make it less true since, well, it's really not all that true to begin with. What you're probably intending to say is that fewer companies say "Works with Debian!" on their advertising material or list it as "officially supported". I've had *very* few problems running commercial apps on Debian (including things like Oracle and IBM SAN management software). Generally it's just take the rpms and either install them *using* rpm (which is available in Debian...) or use alien to convert them to a tarball and/or deb. HP is actually pretty big into Debian and I'd be curious as to what the problems installing the monitoring tools were. My guess is that the issue is actually some kernel module or something, in which case any kernel that they don't build the module (or write it, depending..) for may be problematic. This would probably include some releases of RedHat/SuSe (ES, Fedora, who knows) and pretty much any kernel you build using sources off of kernel.org or for any other distribution unless you know exactly what versions/patches they support. Feel free to contact me off-list if you'd like to continue this discussion since I don't really see it as appropriate for this list. Thanks, Stephen --Dw7F2rfFuuIXZgJ2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE2H4JrzgMPqB3kigRAhmfAJ96HuRV4jk/Xlwv50fH/vPyPvXyxQCfb39M cOhoPjFNMbzLu5c45Zm7xKw= =Bdsp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dw7F2rfFuuIXZgJ2--