X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC719FB3EE for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:03:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41598-02 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:59:35 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from colo-dns-ext2.juniper.net (colo-dns-ext2.juniper.net [207.17.137.64]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4531F9FB3E4 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:59:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from merlot.juniper.net (merlot.juniper.net [172.17.27.10]) by colo-dns-ext2.juniper.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id k7IHxW1Z084820; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:59:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kenjim@juniper.net) Received: from kenjim-lnx.juniper.net (kenjim-lnx.juniper.net [172.17.58.60]) by merlot.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id k7IHxVg93147; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:59:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kenjim@juniper.net) Received: from kenjim-lnx.juniper.net (kenjim-lnx.juniper.net [127.0.0.1]) by kenjim-lnx.juniper.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7IHxMj9016690; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:59:22 -0700 Received: (from kenjim@localhost) by kenjim-lnx.juniper.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k7IHxAtC016683; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:59:10 -0700 Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:59:10 -0700 From: Kenji Morishige To: Roman Neuhauser Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, kenjim@juniper.net Subject: Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 Message-ID: <20060818175909.GA16222@juniper.net> References: <20060808204354.GN29379@juniper.net> <44D906E1.7010405@commandprompt.com> <20060812162019.GA1340@dagan.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060812162019.GA1340@dagan.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.05 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/304 X-Sequence-Number: 20489 Regarding the DL585 etc boxes from HP, they seem to require external JBOD or SCSI/SAS enclosures. Does anyone have any particular preference on how these units should be configured or speced? I'm guessing I'll use the onboard SCSI RAID 1 with the onboard drives for the OS, but will need 2 external channels for the data and xlog. Any recommendations there? Sincerely, Kenji On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 04:20:19PM +0000, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # jd@commandprompt.com / 2006-08-08 14:49:21 -0700: > > >I am considering a setup such as this: > > > - At least dual cpu (possibly with 2 cores each) > > > - 4GB of RAM > > > - 2 disk RAID 1 array for root disk > > > - 4 disk RAID 1+0 array for PGDATA > > > - 2 disk RAID 1 array for pg_xlog > > > > > >Does anyone know a vendor that might be able provide such setup? > > > > I would look at the HP DL 385 or 585. The 385 is going to max a (2) dual > > core cpus. The 585 is (4) dual core cpus. > > I don't know about DL385 or DL585, but DL380 seem to go south within > 1 year of heavy hitting; precisely the Smart Array RAID controllers > (4 out of 6 disks suddenly "red"; insert new disks, ooops red as > well). > > I've seen this happen several times, and came away with a conclusion > that DL380 is sexy, but you don't want to marry it. Then again, > maybe the DL385 is different, though I seem to remember that both > G3 (Smart Array 5i) and G4 (6i) did this. > > -- > How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? > You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. > Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991