Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9379F9FB1 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:16:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06394-09-2 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:16:27 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DC69FA4B4 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:16:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from trofast.sesse.net ([129.241.93.32]) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GXIP1-0002Vk-FE for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:16:15 +0200 Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GXIOm-0002Lz-00 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:16:00 +0200 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:16:00 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Simple join optimized badly? Message-ID: <20061010141600.GA9005@uio.no> Mail-Followup-To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: <20061010011042.93217.qmail@web52308.mail.yahoo.com> <452B108C.7020703@modgraph-usa.com> <452B11FF.5020904@commandprompt.com> <20061010140702.GB72517@nasby.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061010140702.GB72517@nasby.net> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.17.11 on a x86_64 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? --> http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.037 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/186 X-Sequence-Number: 21315 On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:07:03AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > Would you put something from the obfuscated C contest > into production with comments describing what it does, If nothing else, it would be a nice practical joke =) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/